Dawn2 wrote:
xaviersxmen wrote:
She isnt takiung her time she is sticking her nose into other countrys affairs.
I find that comment incredibly rude and foolish. If you'd rather have a fantasy book out than children in need helped, then you really DO need to sort out your priorities.
I don't care when it comes out. If more important things come up, I think Rowling should do them before writing a book about something that isn't even real.
*applauds dawn* Well said!
xaviersxmen wrote:
jellyoflight wrote:
xaviersxmen wrote:
They both cant die. The profocy said one will live and the other will die by the others hand. Its not Tom riddle because thats the same person come on she wasNT talking bettween the lines.
1) Not Harry
2)Not the Dark lord.
3) what luck would it be to be hagrid with only one human parent?
4) NONE of the weaslys because full blooded can be tracked from the begining. Thats what that thing on the wall at Blacks house was(in the book). It was a family tree tracked back from the begining and all full blooded familys would have that.
5) Not Hurminoe because she has muggle parents(not squib!)
So who does that leave? Dumbldor, because we know little about him. All we know is he was from Griffendor. Plus we that know the books know he is a powerful wizard.
No one would get that house elf he would most likely kill himself because of his loyalty.
Don't you remember in the 2nd book, where Dobby gave harry the warning, and stated that it
wasn't voldemort. And it turned out to be Tom Riddle?
But that was Tom riddle. But now all that was Tom riddle is now gone.
Actually, he isn't gone. He lives on, he's vodemort. Just because the memory of him is gone, doesn't mean that he is.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
