allnameswereout wrote:
Although not necessarily the best example this phenomenom is typical when organisations (non-profit or commercial) get bigger: the "left arm" doesn't know what the "right arm" does; it gets more impersonal; users are more like a number; oldschool users want that "old time" and leave; and before you know it all really changed.
I bet this is how McDonalds became what it is. I bet this is how Google became what it is...
Personally i don't care who does the editorials. I think, whoever does it, should keep it both 1) informative and 2) funny. That is the case right now, in my opinion. You can't expect someone, wether its Snarkie or Donna or someone else, to do the same thing all their life since situations, people, and people's interests & priorities change.
Well the editorial was just an example. It used to be one of the ways that you could feel connected with the people behind the site, and that was cool. You knew who was answering it, and you could put a face to the words, and it made the site seem more... comfortable. It just seems like now, it truly is just one big corperation.
Shroomy once posted on here that she didn't like it when the term TNT was used because there was a bunch of real people behind the site. But, to me at least, that idea has felt missing in the past few months for some reason. We never really hear from any one person. It's all "We...".