Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:51 pm
Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:52 pm
background_noise wrote:I'm sorry I ever asked, what a mess this has become!
Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:03 am
Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:41 am
Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:45 am
Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:22 am
Six wrote:Example:
http://www.neopets.com/process_click.phtml?item_id=4605 Is the click for the Aladdin game. Change 4605 to 4606 and you get redirected back to the home page. The same on up to 4608, which takes you to an ABC kids go site. of course, we don't KNOW if any particular site pays, or if it does, WHAT it pays until you see a change in your NP's.
the page that everyone keeps referring to by jadephoenix does not use the PROCESSCLICK part -hers go directly to the website
not through NEO...so would this be considered an other activity as the editorial put it?
Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:50 pm
Six wrote:the page that everyone keeps referring to by jadephoenix does not use the PROCESSCLICK part -hers go directly to the website
patjade wrote:Vague, isn't it? Since there is an email on the webpage, all that needs be done is a request to take it down and that can happen quickly. They DID say they weren't freezing people for clicking on them. They just would like for people to use the pages those links are found on.
Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:39 pm
Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:10 am
Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:47 am
Six wrote:Uh, yes it does. I use(ed) that site every day for a long time. The links have the process_click in them. You couldn't get NP from them if they didn't.
sorry Meer- I stand corrected about the process_click part ...it comes and goes so fast sometimes that you don't notice it unless you watch carefully
Has anyone been frozen for doing them? People must still be doing them or the hoopla wouldn't have died down so fast? I still can't decide.
thanks for listening and setting me straight on that.
Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:13 am
Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:17 am
Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:45 am
Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:03 am
Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:24 pm