Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:51 am
Ledi wrote:I liked the compacter, slightly chubbier Jhuidah as well. It did show that there wasn't just the stereotypical barbie-doll figure on the site, which is pretty much everything else I look at (the other faeries, female heroes, etc). This is not a good thing for the self-esteem of younger children who don't happen to have supermodel figures and can't wear revealing and skimpy clothing.
mercurius wrote:full-figured fairies? I'd honestly not want to have to look at a frumpy lumpy faerie. They made her look action-hero-y. She has the kind of dynamic physique that you'd see in comic books. How many women action heros do you know are fat and wear full length skirts with shirts that button up to their eyebrows?
Fri Oct 29, 2004 8:29 am
Elurial wrote:And, incidentally, I've never considered any of the faeries to be anorexic. Granted, they aren't large, but that doesn't mean they all suffer from eating disorders. There's a big difference between being naturally thin (or fit) and being anorexic.
Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:27 am
Fri Oct 29, 2004 10:55 am
Ledi wrote:Sorry, when I start on an idea, I don't let it go. So, I drew this up. It's a Brightvale Faerie.
See! It's not a stick!
Fri Oct 29, 2004 11:53 am
Ledi wrote:Sorry, when I start on an idea, I don't let it go. So, I drew this up. It's a Brightvale Faerie.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v494/ ... faerie.jpg
See! It's not a stick!
Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:42 pm
DM was on fire! wrote:Istanbullfrog wrote:I love the hypocrisy on neopets though, why aren't there any male faeries? Oh wait, males can't be FAERIES its just not done.
And I don't understand why all the faeries need be so scantily clad.
Isn't the Negg Faerie male?
Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:23 pm
Ledi wrote:Sorry, when I start on an idea, I don't let it go. So, I drew this up. It's a Brightvale Faerie.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v494/ledi/merifaerie.jpg
See! It's not a stick!
Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Fri Oct 29, 2004 6:03 pm
Wolfdragon18 wrote:For those that are as old on neopets as I, you'll remember the OLD faeries. With no face, and LOTS of clothing.
Uber faeries: (these seemed to.. oh... die?! didn't they?)
And while it doesn't exactly fit here... The Negg faerie looked rather... 'special'
There are the originals. Once they started changing them, they got a lot less clothing... And slowly turned into what we see today. Half-naked-perfect-bodies-with-wings.
Fri Oct 29, 2004 6:04 pm
Fri Oct 29, 2004 6:09 pm
Adam wrote:Wow.
The faeries looks like "Image hosted by tripod"?
AMAZING FAERIES!
Fri Oct 29, 2004 6:36 pm
Qanda wrote:Ledi wrote:Sorry, when I start on an idea, I don't let it go. So, I drew this up. It's a Brightvale Faerie.
See! It's not a stick!
Oooh nice, looks very motherly to me.But in my opinion a brightvale faerie will look very classy and elegant (kind of snobbish-like), though. This one looks very suitable for the soup kitchen.
The soup faerie looks too thin.
Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:03 pm
Ledi wrote:Sorry, when I start on an idea, I don't let it go. So, I drew this up. It's a Brightvale Faerie.
See! It's not a stick!
Sat Oct 30, 2004 8:17 am
Wolfdragon18 wrote:-.-'
They were working... ANd I found them via another site... So no yellin'! -hiss-
I'll save them and move them to a photobucket account and try again!
Sat Oct 30, 2004 8:30 am