Raza wrote:
_mash_ wrote:
My problem with it? My sis-in-law has enough trouble trying to keep my 10 year old neice from wanting to be grown up too fast. Now you want her to ask Mommy about the 'heat of the moment' and ask her advice on the right birth control? I don't think so! My sis will have that talk with when it's time. She shouldn't learn about it on a website she clicked on from a banner from a 'family site'. Luckily my brother is a computer geek and she already know never to click on most banners and ads.
I'd argue that whenever they ask or look for the information that that's probably the best judgement on when someone is ready. And what exactly is the harm of learning it elsewhere or early?
Quote:
o.o, okaaaay, that ad should not be there, and it's not too much that it's a birth contol ad, but waht the ad says. Have most of you people saying 'birth control ads aren't that bad' even looked at it? ._.
That ad should not be there.
What's so bad about it? It's a bit unclear, which would work against it's efficiency... which would be to the advantage of those not wanting it to be there in the first place, and it's not at all graphic, which again is an argument for it staying.
Sooo, if a person looks for a website or books on childcare, he/she is ready to have a baby? That's what it sounds like your saying. I also think a parent should be a parent and not leave it up to a website or the schoolyard. It may be a very necessary disscusion, but a website that doesn't let you say hot, even when you talk about the weather is no place for it.
EDIT- I just thought about this... forget about the whole arguement graphicness and parent/kid thing... It shouldn't be on Neo because it violates their own appropriateness rules,