Fri Sep 16, 2005 1:23 am
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:06 am
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:13 am
Jetro wrote:Can someone shed some light on this new one for me. sort of stumped. I used to be good at math until.. ..i guess got lost in Calculus somewhere..
For this one,
4 corner pieces
4 inside pieces
8 outside pieces
Which to me means, that the 4 corner pieces will always remain there, and can only change amoungst themselves.
Same with the inside as well as the outside pieces.
Not asking anyone to give me the answer, as Im sure we all want that extra 2000 np ::grins:: Just someone care to point me into the right direction or assist me on this?
Thanks.
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:16 am
XenaAndGabrielle wrote:Jetro wrote:Can someone shed some light on this new one for me. sort of stumped. I used to be good at math until.. ..i guess got lost in Calculus somewhere..
For this one,
4 corner pieces
4 inside pieces
8 outside pieces
Which to me means, that the 4 corner pieces will always remain there, and can only change amoungst themselves.
Same with the inside as well as the outside pieces.
Not asking anyone to give me the answer, as Im sure we all want that extra 2000 np ::grins:: Just someone care to point me into the right direction or assist me on this?
Thanks.
The way I read the question ... is that the 4 corner pieces can be arranged in a variery of different ways. But you know that it *is* a corner piece ... so each of those 4 pieces has to be in the corners.
Same with the inside and outside pieces.
Now, you have to figure out how many combinations of possibilities you could have.
My hint: Start with fewer tiles ... and just try it out. See if you can start to see the pattern.
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:18 am
Jetro wrote:Well - just did some toying around with the smaller numbers to see if i was on the right path. So just nudge me if i am or not.
for a combination of 4 numbers, there are 256 possible combinations? 4 to the exponent of 4?
Or am i like way off in left field? I came up with a 5 digit answer but not sure if im even remotely close...
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:22 am
XenaAndGabrielle wrote:Jetro wrote:Well - just did some toying around with the smaller numbers to see if i was on the right path. So just nudge me if i am or not.
for a combination of 4 numbers, there are 256 possible combinations? 4 to the exponent of 4?
Or am i like way off in left field? I came up with a 5 digit answer but not sure if im even remotely close...
You could answer your own question ... just pick fewer tiles.
If you only had 2 tiles ... how many different ways could you orient them?
The answer is not 4 different ways.
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:27 am
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:29 am
Jetro wrote:XenaAndGabrielle wrote:Jetro wrote:Well - just did some toying around with the smaller numbers to see if i was on the right path. So just nudge me if i am or not.
for a combination of 4 numbers, there are 256 possible combinations? 4 to the exponent of 4?
Or am i like way off in left field? I came up with a 5 digit answer but not sure if im even remotely close...
You could answer your own question ... just pick fewer tiles.
If you only had 2 tiles ... how many different ways could you orient them?
The answer is not 4 different ways.
Well, 2 in that case.
In the event of three, it would be pc1,pc2 pc3 - pc1,pc3,pc2 - pc2,pc1,pc3 - pc2,pc3,pc1 - pc3,pc2,pc1, pc3,pc1,pc2 (pc = piece), that be 6, right? or am i missing any?
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:32 am
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:34 am
sirclucky wrote:I jsut assumed there was one way to orriante each peice and that the rest was trying to trick us. Sp basically four differnt edges, 8 sides, 4 middles and go from there. Hope im right
Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:08 am
Fri Sep 16, 2005 8:10 am
Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:52 pm
Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:40 pm
Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:25 pm