Sun May 08, 2005 1:25 am
Sun May 08, 2005 1:32 am
Sun May 08, 2005 1:48 am
stampsyne wrote:A problem with Morningstar's plan - this would keep you and your husband from both selling the same item. That would not be fair for multisibling households. I can hear it now. "Mom! Sherri is selling her A Mysterious Valentines Card so I cannot sell mine!" *fighting ensues*
Sun May 08, 2005 2:02 am
stampsyne wrote:A problem with Morningstar's plan - this would keep you and your husband from both selling the same item. That would not be fair for multisibling households. I can hear it now. "Mom! Sherri is selling her A Mysterious Valentines Card so I cannot sell mine!" *fighting ensues*
Raising the max in people's shops would not be that hard. Also, a check box that makes an item a gallery instead of for sell would be excellent. Anything over 100,000 would automatically go to gallery item until the shop owner changes it so that no uber item gets sold during the switchover.
ALSO I would love to see a trading post option that fufrills a minimum met option. You know, like for example 250K for this item, 300K =auto. Actyually MAKING 300K an automatic accept.
Maybe that is wishful thinking.
Sun May 08, 2005 2:02 am
stampsyne wrote:Also, a check box that makes an item a gallery instead of for sell would be excellent. Anything over 100,000 would automatically go to gallery item until the shop owner changes it so that no uber item gets sold during the switchover.
ALSO I would love to see a trading post option that fufrills a minimum met option. You know, like for example 250K for this item, 300K =auto. Actyually MAKING 300K an automatic accept.
Maybe that is wishful thinking.
Sun May 08, 2005 3:23 am
Trick wrote:stampsyne wrote:Also, a check box that makes an item a gallery instead of for sell would be excellent. Anything over 100,000 would automatically go to gallery item until the shop owner changes it so that no uber item gets sold during the switchover.
There are so many unbuyable items nowadays though that I'm surprised the limit hasn't been raised already. Surely it would take next to no time to implement and they could just bump all items set at greater than or equal to 100,000 up to the new limit. Or letting us set it simply as a gallery item and non-buyable. And that trading post idea would be a dream =)
Heh, I hope it's not wishful thinking
Sun May 08, 2005 5:08 am
Sun May 08, 2005 3:00 pm
LOL,..get this. Yesterday i was refreshing my trades on the post. Guess who i got a neomail from,..yep. He wrote " will u trade me ur pirate kacheek mp for a Magenta Neopets Mug? mug is worth way over 3mil on tp" I wrote him back saying that he was the same person who inflated the badges and i dont accept JUNK on my lots, and if he knew what was good for him he wouldnt write me again or i would report him. (which i should have done anyways)
Mon May 09, 2005 2:18 pm
Mon May 09, 2005 2:34 pm
Cleo_Lo wrote:Hmmm. It might not be againt the rules, but I think it is an uber-nasty way of making NP.
Mon May 09, 2005 2:43 pm
Chakra_ wrote:Cleo_Lo wrote:Hmmm. It might not be againt the rules, but I think it is an uber-nasty way of making NP.
yeah it is very nasty but you cannot deny it as a tactical approach on the business point of view. It is a good way and so far i doubt TNT have said anything about this... Have they?
Tue May 10, 2005 6:26 am