For Neopets ONLY discussion.
Tue May 10, 2005 8:02 pm
Hmm a bit suspicius to me ... the user has premium BUT still has the top banner ads ....not right i think ?
Tue May 10, 2005 8:03 pm
aliboy wrote:Hmm a bit suspicius to me ... the user has premium BUT still has the top banner ads ....not right i think ?
I have the portal and not premium because I was a beta tester, and he says it's his friends' portal. =)
Tue May 10, 2005 8:07 pm
Umm.. Im a premium member and I dont see it in the beta test section of the portal.. and if you're premium, you DONT have ads.
Tue May 10, 2005 8:07 pm
I have premium, but I just checked and there is no Marshmallow World available to beta test. Hmm...that banner and what you can see of the map looks fake to me.
Tue May 10, 2005 8:09 pm
It's Jelly world with a new name.
*pokes the jelly buildings*
Tue May 10, 2005 8:11 pm
Its a fake. The wee bit of the "Marshmallow world" that is visible is just a recoloring of Jelly World.
Tue May 10, 2005 8:13 pm
atomicblonde wrote:aliboy wrote:Hmm a bit suspicius to me ... the user has premium BUT still has the top banner ads ....not right i think ?
I have the portal and not premium because I was a beta tester, and he says it's his friends' portal. =)
My daughter has the portal, but I never downloaded it at the time it was available. And, my daughter cannot open my account in her portal--only her own. Therfore, I do not see how this person could open their account in their friend's portal. And, the user name and Pet name at the top belong to this person not his friend.
Cute idea, though. Though Marshmallow World would get awfully sticky if it ever rained!
Last edited by
Morningstar on Tue May 10, 2005 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tue May 10, 2005 8:14 pm
It's basically the jelly world with a few words changed and new colour. nothing really great
Tue May 10, 2005 8:54 pm
I've got to agree it looks fake, though they did a pretty good job. The header image doesn't have the faint glowiness around the text, and the enlarged Marshmallow Grundo is all pixely (I believe they generally use vector images so that doesn't happen).
Tue May 10, 2005 9:15 pm
Not to mention that the faded text in the background of the banner is still heffaklump, and TNT uses arial for that.
And the border of the banner is kind of mangled.
Last edited by
Erin on Tue May 10, 2005 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tue May 10, 2005 9:16 pm
Erin wrote:Not to mention that the faded text in the background of the banner is still heffaklump, and TNT uses arial for that.
Coolvetica.
Tue May 10, 2005 9:17 pm
o_0 wrote:Erin wrote:Not to mention that the faded text in the background of the banner is still heffaklump, and TNT uses arial for that.
Coolvetica.
This is getting disturbing.
I wouldn't have noticed, but I made a few fake header images awhile back and got to know what they looked like. Apparently you two have been doing the same. Though I think I used arial, o_0.
Tue May 10, 2005 9:21 pm
*shrug* Looks like Arial to me. I've never used Coolvetica though, so you're probably right.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.