A simple fact that males are stronger than females. By saying that I'm not being discriminatory, I'm stating a fact.
Men are also faster than women, which is why in athletics events and suchlike there are separate races for men and women. If girls/boys wrestled, girls would never win (going on averages, obviously you have to generalise, but you can't take this case by case, there must be a set rule for this kind of thing or you run into all sorts of problems).
I have such a problem with all these women who immediately jump on something you say for being sexist. If I was being sexist I'd say 'girls shouldn't wrestle because they're weak' or 'girls shouldn't wrestle boys and i'm not basing this on any sort of fact but merely on the fact i think boys are superior to girls'. Yeesh, feminism going off the scale.
Although it doesn't apply so much when you're younger, it wouldn't be fair at all to have girls and boys wrestling in the same categories competitively.
It also honestly is more dangerous for the girl, as a rule.
Kyra wrote:
"some of the girls looked like they could've snapped a guy in half, so I don't think people should be worried about the girls getting hurt.
Perhaps so, but unfortunately in sports you HAVE TO generalise. It's safer for those involved to assume that in general the girl will get hurt, than to assume they will all be completely fairly matched and them get very hurt.
Also, sure, they could've snapped a guy in half, but a guy wrestler? Hm.