Fiddleysquat
The first think I jhnoticed about your article is the amazing amount of detail, and this really creates lifelike detail and it makes it seem so muh more like I am immersed within the tsory. Even within the first three lines, I thought that I was already within the story. I also like they way that you've used colours to show the fac tht atsomething is wrong. It all just flows, even though you've got to fit in certain words, and I forgot that you even had to put the word 'clone' in until I read it.
Having read much fiction recently trying to relax, I feel that the best compliment that I can fgive your story is that it is much better than most of the stuff I have read recently. The fact of the matter is that it just flows so well, and the use of tempo is used perfectly, alternating sentence structure and vocabulary to play into the hands of humour, especially liking the section about the son with everything falling into place and the switching from long to short sentences in the last section in order to make a blunt observation, which actually made me laugh out loud. However, I feel that the sentences you are usign become a bit too short and simplistic in the next paragraph and that it becomes "X does this. I am Y. You are Z" and this makes it slightly jarring to read, as well as a little monotonous when it repeats this sort of structure into the next line, altough the use of paragraphing to isolate the next sentence is again a great way to accomplish humour.
I feel that you are using 'I' too much in the sentences and that especially in the paragraph regarding Sinatra, you are falling back into the habit of "I am X. I like Y. The radio does Y." which doesn't make for fluid reading.
In my opinion, the weakest section of the story is the paragraph in which you describe the boat. THe problem is that you're just using vvast lists, and I think that it is obvious that this apragraph is the one which you are using everything to fit in. The list is massive and doesn't need to be there, contributing absolutely nothing and just bulking out the action. The story would still work if you took it all out, and it slows down the pace, altough it sets the story into another great oppurnity for self-pity and humour.
Reading through the story for the first time, I realised that there were far too many characters. THere was Paul, Allen, Miranda, a passing mention to Margaret and then there was Vanessa, the daughter and her fiancee of which none of them really play any impact on the plot and do't really need to be there. Even the start of the story bears no relevance to the actionless passage which is to follow.
In a short story, there is a neccessity to keep detail to a minimum, purely because if you keep introducing negligible facts to the story all the way through, you are left with a story which is basicalyl description, with short paragraphs linknig them which describe a placid story, and I feel that perhaps this is a trap with which you have fallen into. If we had not been told that it was on a yacht, that he had a breathing tube and that his nurse was called Vannessa, there would be no real problem with the story and the fact of the matter is that it would make it move a lot faster and stop the story from becoming a little boring. It's an entertaining read, but the fact is that at the start of the story, we are presented with a man who hates everything and is celebrating his birthday, and all wea re told throughout the story is how he hates people and they hate him - not exactly a thhrilling read.
The tone of the story is rather light-hearted and comedic uyp until the point in which he starts crying, and I feel the section about revenge just seems so iout of place and anti-climatic that it just doesn't really sit correctly with the rest of the story. The "They are just my creation" is a really dramatic line, but it doesn't really mean anything, and I feel that it doesn't sit right.
The sudden skipping of a large passage pof the story and putting a massive change of pace and location into one short paragraph seems a little bit strange, especially considering that it is a major transition
I don't quite know what is exactly happening in the penultimate stanza, but if he's dying, I feel that this could be a little patronising and not something that is supposed to have been mad einto a comedy. However I feel that you have done it with taste, and the last line reflects the rest of the story well, and is a good way to end it and this just makes it seem peaceful.
Tested
One of the fiurs tproblems I encountered with your stories is the fact that it was very casual, and although this is accepted in dialect, I think your use of the word "guy" and your casual tone made it a little hard to read, and made it a little jarrigng, although I suppose it does suggest an image of the character we have seen. This gets much worse as we start moving into the latter paragraphs, as youre using dialect in "ya know" and overall it just feels as though you aren't putting in enough effort; considering that it is genral prose which should really be written in proper English to make it readable and to distinguish the prose from the speech.
After the second passage, I had absolutely no idea what was going on, I'm afraid. There was a movie about clones, which I could understand if you were trying to give an image, and then you were talking about ninjas, totally leaving behind the Jeff, the man and the clones. I like your use of rhetorical quesitons; althoguh to be honest, in a story I feel that the point of rhetorical questions in a story are to prompt thought and if you don't pursure the story then it seems a bit insulting to ask them, telling your readers to guess a reason for him kinowing your name, and then rendering that piece of information totally useless when you move onto something else which gives no clues and bears no relevance to the other information.
When you use an ellipsis, you should make sure that the sentence is not interrupted by this, and that it makes fluent sense either side of it. This is a bigger problem when you are talking about tohughts, because they do flow together and you don't have a thought pattern of thinking about robots for a few minutes, beffore waiting fvive seconds and then moving onto the next totally unrelated train of thought - it is all related. YOu';ve done this very well a couple of times, althoguh I feel that your lapse a couple of times really spoilt the story.
OF course, I love the idea of the story and I feel that this was executed well. THe way that you used imagery and causal tones does give the image of the mind, and whether or not I like it, I have to admit that it does all flow togetehr and that overall it does read well and make for interesting reading. YOu haven't fallen into the trap iof Fiddleyhsquat and my making this one story a series of short stories you have managed to make it very action based and not poring at all.
I feel that you have employed humour very well, and that this could actually be a sketch for a comedienne in front of a drunk audience at the London Paladium, as it's very light hearted, it seems very casual and that it would make an audience laugh a lot. It also fits the bill for comedians and this makes it seem very flowing and very light heartedl. It's got the same sense of random humour that just appeals to certain people.
My biggest complained that I have about this story is that it just doesn't flow that well, and that each paragraph is completely detached from the paragraph before it. It just doesn't flow as a story, and the story and the ending just don't really do anything and it could just be an extract from something so much bigger, it just doesn't seem closed and it needs soemthing more definite at the start and at the end to stand there.
--
Good luck, both of you; and I encourage everyone to enter the Ivy Thread