For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:36 pm

Rubywinged wrote:Also before someone rez's Typhoon that person needs to be able to come right out and admit they are the one who rezed him. It seems rez's are hard to prove seeing as no matter what -i- did no one wanted to believe I was still an innocent until my role was used. So if someone does wish to rez please have a way to prove that others will believe


The rezzer does not need to come forward on the thread. I don't know why people are (sorry) stupidly revealing their roles on the thread. If the rezzer wants to prove their innocence, they rez the right people and only let a few select people know who they are. If the rezzer dies, we're screwed, so we don't want that person to just blindly reveal their role on the thread.

I'm still iffy on Blake's role and I've contacted a couple people about it. I believe you about Twinkle, but I think some of your "facts" are a little unsound.

Vote: Twinkle

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:03 pm

Vote: Twinkle

Cause it seems to make sense at the moment.
Any innocents that haven't contacted me, feel free to do so.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:19 pm

Rissa - I asked, because if you read the next post, which is Alex's - she mentions something about Twinkle. Besides the obvious fact that Blake never said they'd actually dreamt of Twinkle in that post. Nor did they even vote for Twinkle. Assuming things, and hastily jumping to conclusions - is folly.

Blake - It sounds like you are a role-line dreamer. Which the entire business of being revealed, is really sketchy at best. Can someone else possibly try and check Blake out? They may be right, but we won't really know until Twinkle dies.

Four dreamers? I think that someone is probably lying.

I agree with May - there has been too much revealing of roles. As well, it looks like a bit too much of flapping tongues. Why would you go and out yourself, and you just put a target on Anvil's back - if you are telling the truth.

Sheesh, this is Werewolf! Not Werewolf Anonymous.


Vote: Twinkle

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:26 pm

Vote: Twinkle

Cause...

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:01 pm

All i can say is blake told me who he was early on that's what he told me. As to believability *shrugs* no more or less then anyone else who's Role traded with me.


I really only outed myself after i died and was rezed cause well everyone already knew lol i feel bad for others who have stuck there neck way out for me :(

also i know one of the dreamers i'm on contact with is truthful... the other I believe but have no evidence cause well there is only one Voldemort kinda hard to say. what else again blake reveled fairly early on to me so I go with believing.... and there are anywhere for 3 to 4 groups of baddies so why not 4 dreamers?

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:55 pm

Event, Day 9
Ange was sitting in the hall, trying to decide which of the many items she had obtained at night to keep, when a fierce growl came from down the hall. She turned to run, but alas, the little that was left of her shield was not enough to save her from a werewolf attack. Ironically enough, it was not the first time a werewolf had attacked her, as it turned out she was Lupin, who had been attacked by a werewolf many years back. Her items lay where she had sat, scattered. There was a shiny locket, a wrapped package, and two potions.


Result:
Ange was mauled by a werewolf. She was Lupin, the protector from dementors.


Players still at Hogwarts: 27 Majority Single: 14 Majority Double: 21

Mod note: sorry I haven't been on all day, am still sick-ish and had a doctor's appointment.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:05 pm

everyone unvote Twinkle now.

I've just used up a small corked vial that erased her memory so now she's innocent. :) It was an sp so I had to wait before Pickles gave me the ok to talk about it.

Twinkle, if you're allowed, tell us who were your teammates please.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:11 pm

Grabs locket

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:17 pm

I doubt that a power could convert an evil person in a team to evil. Every time that has happened in a game the game has gone awry and failed. It breaks the game and it isn't fair to the evil team left behind :/

So I doubt that if that happened Twinkle would be allowed to reveal their team mates.

Now i'm not sure who to vote xD

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:23 pm

*grabs potions!*

also

unvote: Twinkle

vote: No execution


for the moment just dont wanna forget to vote lol
Last edited by Rubywinged on Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:24 pm

*grabs wrapped package*

everyone else is taking something... :p

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:30 pm

Rubywinged wrote:*grabs potions!*

also

unvote: Twinkle

vote: No execution


for the moment just dont wanna forget to vote lol

You may only take one potion. There's still one left.

Also, if I don't respond right away, we keep losing power due to a bad storm. I'm trying to get stuff out ASAP.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:32 pm

Accio other potion!
Unvote: Twinkle
I'm not sure whether or not I believe Twinkle's innocent now, but better not to risk killing an innocent.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:34 pm

Vote: 3lla

Someone who I still think is evil

Also, I think there's every chance twinkle could be evil, and we shouldn't go purely on what warxelo says.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:44 pm

A werewolf attack on Lupin. Ironic, much?

The Twinkle thing seems too good to be true, but warxelo wouldn't be allowed to lie publicly about a special power, right? I dunno.

Unvote: Twinkle for now, I suppose
Topic locked