Thanks. Will do. I think I'm going to stick around a bit until until the end. Live and learn, you know.
May wrote:
Hmm... I wonder if that's the elven rope that Frodo and Sam used as a leash for Gollum...
Possibly. Sam is still in the game, no? However, it seems to me that there are plenty of other characters who could have use for Elven Rope (Arwen?) and it was also one of the gifts of Galadriel, which may have already been distributed. And yeah, I see no reason whatsoever being given for voting on Jas either.
Wind wrote:
Jas, I don't think it matters if you can't kill. You're evil. Guess what, on top of my role sheet it says something along the lines of "Winning condition: defeat all evil". If we had someone else to vote it would make sense to wait, but why should we let you around when you're the only confirmed baddie we know of?
Agreed. Confirmed evil means the chopping block. Jas may not be able to do much more, but we're not gonna execute anyone else tonight, so why not get rid of another baddie?
PS: I cannot delete and repost in CI, and no one else is posting in Valinor, so I thought I'd just double post to draw attention to this thread. Doesn't count for post count anyway.
AmmerEdit: You are not allowed to double post anywhere on this forum. As this is Werewolf, only the MC is allowed to double post. Thanks!Jas O'Lantern wrote:
Regan wrote:
This recurring theme is getting annoying. If the innocents need to win by killing the baddies, then why not do it?
All I'm saying is that I cannot harm anyone. I'd think it'd be better worth your time to use an execution for someone who can harm you. If you kill me and leave someone who is harmful, all you've done is gotten rid of someone who could do nothing to you and let the person who could do you harm have more chances to do so.
No argument. There isn't enough time to find another baddie and collect twelve votes tonight.
Katherine wrote:
Regan wrote:
Katherine wrote:
Move:Lothlórien
Vote: Ammer
Why are you voting Ammer?
Ammer hasn't been cleared, has he? I just skimmed the thread.
Neither has Jas. At least make it a double vote.
Please read: might be important!I might have a new suspect for the innocents:
Wind wrote:
Jas, I don't think it matters if you can't kill. You're evil. Guess what, on top of my role sheet it says something along the lines of "Winning condition: defeat all evil". If we had someone else to vote it would make sense to wait, but why should we let you around when you're the only confirmed baddie we know of?
Both roles I played (Treebeard and Gandalf, both innocent) had the exact same wording for their winning condition, which leads me to believe the wording is the same for all innocents. Maybe someone should ask Wind to publicly reveal his knowledge of the exact wording on the winning condition for innocents. If he can not provide it, he's evil. Seems simple enough to me, so excuse me if I missed something.