Pink Poogle Toy Forum

The official community of Pink Poogle Toy
Main Site
NeoDex
It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 12:56 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 279 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:20 pm 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 3780
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 4:56 pm
Location: Right here, I think.
Congratulations, Jade! You certainly deserved it. Congratulations to WIS and Fidds as well, and to all the entrants, and thank you to the judges.

Robert especially, eheh.

=]


Image
|| Set // WIS < 33 ||


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:24 pm 
Way Beyond Godly
Way Beyond Godly

Posts: 8715
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Gender: Female
x) Now you know how I felt when I won PPTTG, Jade.
Congrats! ^^ And congrats to SIW-SIW and Fiddely too. :)


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:31 pm 
PPT God
PPT God
User avatar

Posts: 2207
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 9:42 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Whoever would like thier prizes, please either post or PM me a trade link :)


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:16 pm 
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Posts: 8027
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 5:00 am
Location: Thornhill, Ontario
Gender: Male
Divine wrote:
I have a little something to say, though. Some judges were taking points off the subtexts because the words / ideas used would not necessarily be understood by everyone. I don't think this is really fair... especially because other judges were asking the contestants to use the thesaurus to find more descriptive words (which would likely be more difficult to understand). I think rarer words adds to the beauty and uniqueness of the subtext.

I know the other judges may think differently, but blah... just my opinion.


For me, just because a word is "rare" doesn't make it a perfect fit for a subtext. It still has to flow, which in some cases, some subtexts didn't do.


Image
Set by Medli


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:45 pm 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 2514
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:35 am
Location: England
Gender: Male
Ammer wrote:
Divine wrote:
I have a little something to say, though. Some judges were taking points off the subtexts because the words / ideas used would not necessarily be understood by everyone. I don't think this is really fair... especially because other judges were asking the contestants to use the thesaurus to find more descriptive words (which would likely be more difficult to understand). I think rarer words adds to the beauty and uniqueness of the subtext.

I know the other judges may think differently, but blah... just my opinion.


For me, just because a word is "rare" doesn't make it a perfect fit for a subtext. It still has to flow, which in some cases, some subtexts didn't do.


I think Divine knows that, but some judges choose to mark down simply because some people may not know what a word means, and I think this is a rather poor reason. If people don't know what a word means, hopefully, it'll make them interested enough to research it and expand their vocabulary. This is going to be an exaggerated example, but still get a picture of what I mean;

'Pretty flowers'
Versus
'The transcendency of tulips'

Although some people may not know what transcendency means, doesn't mean they should be marked down for it. It is much better than the first subtext.


Image
Click the wonderful signature. You know you want to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:03 pm 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly

Posts: 3297
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 3:43 am
Location: Set by me.
I fully agree with Pixa and Icey here.

I recall many rounds in the first few competitions where I was marked down or even eliminated because I had extravagent words in my subtext. As Pixa proved quite nicely, this is not fair. In order to 'dumb down' a subtext to the point where *everyone* will understand it, you're not going to end up with anything worth using, as Pixa's example pointed out quite nicely.


Mas mothaionn tu fein mar rud eigin caite ar an dtra...
Image
Lig dom goideail an croi duit...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:27 pm 
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Posts: 6220
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:02 am
Location: sakura makes dreams come true.
.:Requiem:. wrote:
I fully agree with Pixa and Icey here.

I recall many rounds in the first few competitions where I was marked down or even eliminated because I had extravagent words in my subtext. As Pixa proved quite nicely, this is not fair. In order to 'dumb down' a subtext to the point where *everyone* will understand it, you're not going to end up with anything worth using, as Pixa's example pointed out quite nicely.


"Dumb down" is a highly offensive term and I assure you I am... well... highly offended.

If I don't know what a word means, then I look it up on http://www.dictionary.com. If there's no definition there or the definition does not make sense, I assume it's not common enough for enough people to see it to make sense. That's when I mark off.

I'm sorry that we as judges aren't smart enough for you, Requiem.


Image
the greatest love story never told.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:15 am 
Honorary Member
Honorary Member
User avatar

Posts: 8027
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 5:00 am
Location: Thornhill, Ontario
Gender: Male
I, for one, have always looked up words in case I didn't know what they meant.

Who exactly are you guys talking about? Don't beat around the bush.


Image
Set by Medli


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:20 pm 
Beyond Godly
Beyond Godly
User avatar

Posts: 2514
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:35 am
Location: England
Gender: Male
Click.

An example, here, last post, CD criticising Anubis, as some people may not know what the word 'Phosphorescent' means.

Click 2.

DM rated FM's subtext;
'FM -- I would probably need to look up the word ethereal in order to understand this subtext, but good job anyway.'

I think it, as being a judge previously, it is more our duty to give all players a fair game. If the word 'etheral' did not fit, and was horribly out of place, then FM should have suffered, and obviously would not have (not saying it was out of place, I rather quite liked it. ;))'


Image
Click the wonderful signature. You know you want to.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 279 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group